Skip to main content
TWI logo The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
logo
wordmark
Homepage

Main navigation

  • Analysis
  • Experts
  • About
  • Support
  • Maps & Multimedia
Trending:
  • Democracy & Reform
  • Terrorism
  • Lebanon
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • Syria

Regions & Countries

  • Egypt
  • Gulf States
  • Iran
  • Iraq
  • Israel
  • Jordan
  • Lebanon
  • Middle East
  • North Africa
  • Palestinians
  • Syria
  • Turkey

Issues

  • Arab & Islamic Politics
  • Arab-Israeli Relations
  • Democracy & Reform
  • Energy & Economics
  • Great Power Competition
  • Gulf & Energy Policy
  • Military & Security
  • Peace Process
  • Proliferation
  • Terrorism
  • U.S. Policy
TWI English
TWI Arabic: اللغة العربية Fikra Forum

Breadcrumb

  • Policy Analysis

U.S. Policy

Policy Analysis on U.S. Policy

Filter by:

Articles & Testimony
The Nuclear Deal with Iran: Regional Implications
While the agreement has a number of significant flaws, at least some can be rectified by various mitigation measures, provided the president is willing to commit to an effective implementation strategy.
Jul 29, 2015
◆
  • Michael Eisenstadt
Articles & Testimony
Potential Regional Implications of the Iran Deal
The agreement does not clearly achieve its main objective of preventing a nuclear-armed Iran, nor does it complement America's broader strategies regarding the Middle East and global nonproliferation.
Jul 29, 2015
◆
  • Michael Singh
Articles & Testimony
Why Jonathan Pollard's Release Means Little
Given the current state of the region, close U.S.-Israeli security and intelligence cooperation is more vital than ever, but repairing the rift between the two governments will require much more than symbolic gestures.
Jul 28, 2015
◆
  • David Makovsky
Articles & Testimony
If the Iran Deal Fails...
Congressional rejection of the nuclear deal wouldn't be pretty, but a messy domestic political battle is a far cry from the president's warnings of potential war with Iran.
Jul 16, 2015
◆
  • Robert Satloff
Articles & Testimony
How Will the Iran Nuclear Deal Affect Broader U.S. Strategy?
If the administration cannot convincingly describe a regional strategy into which the agreement fits, allies and skeptics are likely to assume an unspoken U.S. realignment or simple incoherence.
Jul 15, 2015
◆
  • Michael Singh
Articles & Testimony
What's Really Wrong with the Iran Nuclear Deal
Tactically, the impressively detailed Iran nuclear accord masks major flaws; strategically, it heralds a profound shift in U.S. regional strategy.
Jul 14, 2015
◆
  • Robert Satloff
Articles & Testimony
Iran Deal Leaves U.S. With Tough Questions
The deal with Iran is finally done. Given the stakes, it should be scrutinized. It makes sense to reserve judgment and see how the administration explains all the clauses of the agreement and how they will be implemented. While I look forward to the administration's full explanation of the deal
Jul 14, 2015
◆
  • Dennis Ross
Articles & Testimony
Keeping Iran's Feet to the Fire
Even with a deal now signed, the Obama administration still has many tools for countering Iran’s menacing behavior across the Middle East.
Jul 14, 2015
◆
  • David Makovsky
  • Matthew Levitt
Articles & Testimony
U.S.-GCC Relations: Closing the Credibility Gap
The additional steps promised at the Camp David summit do not constitute a game-changer in U.S.-GCC relations, especially since the Joint Statement is so vague regarding specific steps to counter Iran's destabilizing activities.
Jul 9, 2015
◆
  • Michael Eisenstadt
In-Depth Reports
Public Statement on U.S. Policy Toward the Iran Nuclear Negotiations
Endorsed by a Bipartisan Group of American Diplomats, Legislators, Policymakers, and Experts
Over the last three years, members of this bipartisan group have convened regularly under the auspices of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy to discuss the status of the Iran nuclear issue, frequently benefitting from the input of current Administration officials. Last week, at its most recent meeting, the
Jun 24, 2015
Articles & Testimony
Aligning Means and Ends, Policies and Strategy in the War on ISIL
The means-ends mismatch in Washington's approach to ISIL is a function of several problems, including inadequate commitment of resources, the jihadist group's resilience, the weakness of America's regional partners, and the incoherence of current U.S. strategy.
Jun 24, 2015
◆
  • Michael Eisenstadt
Articles & Testimony
Don't Let the Deadline Drive the Deal
To get the best nuclear pact with Iran, Washington might have to let the June 30 target slide.
Jun 19, 2015
◆
  • Dennis Ross
Articles & Testimony
The War Against ISIL: In Search of a Viable Strategy
Washington has several options beyond a major ground commitment, including more drones and special forces in Iraq, a true effort to arm and organize the Syrian opposition, and a willingness to recognize longer-term regional threats posed by al-Qaeda affiliates and Iran.
Jun 15, 2015
◆
  • Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
The Administration Should Not Meet With the Muslim Brotherhood in Washington
Washington should avoid engaging an organization that calls for "jihad" and "martyrdom" in fighting a strategic ally.
Jun 5, 2015
◆
  • Eric Trager
Articles & Testimony
Why Drip-Feeding U.S. Support Won't Work in Iraq
Without more decisive steps and a greater commitment of forces, the United States cannot expect to achieve its goals against the Islamic State.
Jun 5, 2015
◆
  • Michael Knights
Articles & Testimony
Implications of the Iran Nuclear Agreement for U.S. Policy in the Middle East
Any agreement should be judged not only by its verifiable nuclear restraints, but also by the credibility of U.S. readiness to contain the regime's asymmetrical military, ideological, religious, economic, and diplomatic moves in the region.
Jun 3, 2015
◆
  • James Jeffrey
In-Depth Reports
Contextualizing Israeli Concerns about the Iran Nuclear Deal
Few issues have so polarized U.S. and Israeli leaders as the prospective accord with Iran regarding its nuclear program. Between Obama’s “historic opportunity” and Netanyahu’s “historic mistake” lie differing threat perceptions, divergent worldviews and regional assessments, and a deep deficit of trust. From an Israeli perspective, the U.S. administration has
Jun 2, 2015
◆
  • Michael Herzog
Articles & Testimony
Ramadi 2015 vs. Burma 1942: Spin vs. Grit
The blame game appears so blatant that one might even conclude the administration is intent on throwing in the towel against ISIS.
Jun 1, 2015
◆
  • James Jeffrey
Articles & Testimony
A Policy to Defeat Both ISIL and Iran
The Middle East state system is under relentless pressure, and preserving it will require a long-term vision for shoring up U.S. allies, rolling back ISIL, and countering the Iranians.
May 26, 2015
◆
  • Samuel Berger
  • Stephen Hadley
  • James Jeffrey
  • Dennis Ross
  • Robert Satloff
In-Depth Reports
Deterring an Iranian Nuclear Breakout
Whether or not the P5+1 and Tehran reach a nuclear deal, deterring an Iranian breakout, most likely at clandestine sites, will remain a core U.S. imperative for the foreseeable future. Although the U.S. intelligence community has a strong record of detecting clandestine nuclear programs, it has often failed to correctly
May 20, 2015
◆
  • Michael Eisenstadt

Pagination

  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • First page « First
  • …
  • Page 60
  • Page 61
  • Page 62
  • Page 63
  • Current page 64
  • Page 65
  • Page 66
  • Page 67
  • Page 68
  • …
  • Last page Last »
  • Next page Next ›
Supported by the

Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation Program on Great Power Competition and the Middle East

The Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation Program on Great Power Competition and the Middle East focuses on the region as a setting for heightened competition between the United States and other world powers, such as China and Russia.

Sign Up for Email Updates from The Washington Institute

Never miss a breaking event on U.S. policy interests in the Middle East. Customize your subscription to our expert analysis, op-eds, live events, and special reports.

Sign up

Featured experts

Robert Satloff - source: The Washington Institute
Robert Satloff
Robert Satloff is the Segal Executive Director of The Washington Institute, a post he assumed in January 1993.
Ambassador Dennis Ross
Dennis Ross
Dennis Ross, a former special assistant to President Barack Obama, is the counselor and William Davidson Distinguished Fellow at The Washington Institute.
Michael Singh
Michael Singh
Michael Singh is the Managing Director and Lane-Swig Senior Fellow at The Washington Institute.
Background image with TWI branding
logo
wordmark
Homepage

1111 19th Street NW - Suite 500
Washington D.C. 20036
Tel: 202-452-0650
Fax: 202-223-5364

Footer contact links

  • Contact
  • Press Room
  • Subscribe

The Washington Institute seeks to advance a balanced and realistic understanding of American interests in the Middle East and to promote the policies that secure them.

The Institute is a 501(c)3 organization; all donations are tax-deductible.

Footer quick links

  • About TWI
  • Support the Institute
  • Alumni

Social media

  • The Washington Institute on Facebook facebook
  • The Washington Institute on X x
  • The Washington Institute on YouTube youtube
  • The Washington Institute on LinkedIn linkedin

© 2025 All rights reserved.

Footer

  • Employment
  • Privacy Policy
  • Rights & Permissions