Skip to main content
TWI logo The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
logo
wordmark
Homepage

Main navigation

  • تحلیل‌ها
  • کارشناسان
  • درباره‌ما
  • پشتیبانی
  • نقشه و چند رسانه‌ای
مباحث روز :
  • نظامی و امنیتی
  • منع اشاعه
  • اسرائیل
  • ایران
  • لبنان
  • سوریه

منطقه‌ها و کشورها

  • اردن
  • اسرائیل
  • ایران
  • ترکیه
  • خاورمیانه
  • سوریه
  • شمال آفریقا
  • عراق
  • فلسطینی‌ها
  • لبنان
  • مصر
  • کشورهای حاشیه‌خلیج فارس

موضوع

  • انرژی و اقتصاد
  • تروریسم
  • خلیج و سیاست حوزه انرژی
  • دمکراسی و اصلاح
  • رقابت قدرت‌های بزرگ
  • روابط عرب و اسرائیل
  • سیاست آمریکا
  • عرب و اسلام سیاسی
  • فرایند صلح
  • منع اشاعه
  • نظامی و امنیتی
TWI English
TWI Arabic: اللغة العربية Fikra Forum

نظامی و امنیتی

Policy Analysis on نظامی و امنیتی

Filter by:

Articles & Testimony
Next Steps with Egypt
The recent suspension of U.S. aid to Egypt is a self-inflicted wound, but a flexible interpretation of the gesture and attention to Egypt's economic needs could soften its negative impact.
۱۵ اکتبر ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • Adel El-Adawy
  • David Pollock
Video
Brief Analysis
Israeli Security Policy in an Uncertain Middle East
2013 Zeev Schiff Memorial Lecture
Watch the 2013 Zeev Schiff Memorial Lecture on Middle East Security with Amos Gilad, director of the Political-Military Affairs Bureau at Israel's Ministry of Defense.
۱۱ اکتبر ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • Amos Gilad
◆ Zeev Schiff Memorial Lectures
Brief Analysis
Ten Ways the Syrian Opposition Can Help Fight Extremism
Amid international efforts to rid Syria of chemical weapons, opposition leaders are offering advice about how to prevent extremist groups from gaining a permanent foothold.
۱۱ اکتبر ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • Andrew J. Tabler
Articles & Testimony
Obama Just Made a Terrible Mistake on Egypt
Cutting aid will cost Washington substantial influence in Egypt without achieving any gains for either American geostrategy or democratic prospects within the country.
۹ اکتبر ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • Eric Trager
Video
Bloggingheads: Rouhani and U.S. Iran Policy
Institute managing director Michael Singh joined Matthew Duss of the Center for American Progress for a Bloggingheads.tv discussion of Iranian president Rouhani's UN address and the choices facing U.S. policymakers as they explore diplomatic solutions to the nuclear impasse.
۷ اکتبر ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • Michael Singh
Articles & Testimony
Iraq's Never-Ending Security Crisis
Absent greater U.S.-Iraqi cooperation and stronger political leadership in Baghdad, the country's security crisis could stretch beyond the current decade and become part of the regional landscape.
۳ اکتبر ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • Michael Knights
Brief Analysis
Israeli-Egyptian Peace: Forty Years After the 1973 War and Holding
After surviving four decades of challenges, the peace treaty is gaining new life as Israel quietly forges closer relations with the post-Morsi authorities in Cairo.
۲ اکتبر ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • Ehud Yaari
Articles & Testimony
Trust, but Clarify
Although President Obama should head down the diplomatic road toward a nuclear deal with Iran, he must make exceedingly clear what he will not abide.
۱ اکتبر ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • Dennis Ross
  • David Makovsky
Articles & Testimony
After CW Deal, U.S. Must Keep Its Pledge to Aid the Syrian Opposition
Arming friendly rebel factions could help curb the slaughter of civilians, maintain pressure on Assad, eliminate the need for U.S. military action, and keep extremists in check, among other benefits.
۲۱ سپتامبر ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • David Pollock
Brief Analysis
Framework Agreement on Syria: The Least-Bad Result
The Obama administration should take steps to ameliorate the negative effects of the chemical disarmament agreement, restore Washington's credibility, and preserve its ability to use force if necessary.
۱۶ سپتامبر ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • James Jeffrey
Brief Analysis
The Military Option and Disarmament Diplomacy with Syria
By limiting potential strike options, Washington risks undercutting diplomacy and being drawn into the kind of intensive, open-ended engagement in Syria that it wants to avoid.
۱۳ سپتامبر ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Keeping Military Pressure on Syria
Although a military response to Syria's August 21 chemical weapons attack is on hold, Washington can restore credibility and pressure by threatening to strike immediately if the Assad regime uses such weapons again.
۱۲ سپتامبر ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • James Jeffrey
Articles & Testimony
Should the World Be Intervening Militarily in Syria?
Washington Institute military expert Jeffrey White contributes to an online debate on the merits and goals of potential intervention.
۱۰ سپتامبر ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • Jeffrey White
The Syria Crisis: A Washington Institute Guide
As members of Congress consider President Obama’s request to undertake military action against the forces of President Bashar al-Assad, The Washington Institute presents the following guide to help Americans better understand the crisis in Syria. Since the outbreak of the Syrian civil war in2011, our experts have conducted extensive research
۱۰ سپتامبر ۲۰۱۳
Brief Analysis
Syrian Measures to Mitigate the Effects of a U.S. Strike
Given the nature of the regime's passive defensive capabilities, a powerful U.S. operation of at least several rounds may be necessary.
۹ سپتامبر ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • Jeffrey White
Brief Analysis
Significant Regime Defection in Syria
Members of the Syrian opposition are correct in describing Alawite army general Ali Habib Mahmoud's "defection" to Turkey over the past few days as a "blow to the morale" of the Assad regime. He is the most prominent military official to leave Syria since the July 2012 departure of Brig
۵ سپتامبر ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • Andrew J. Tabler
In-Depth Reports
Syria's Military Opposition:
How Effective, United, or Extremist?
Many options for direct military action in Syria have been on the table, ranging from token strikes with small numbers of weapons to much broader operations such as attacks on leadership targets or the imposition of no-fly and no-drive zones. In addition, the United States could respond indirectly by providing
۵ سپتامبر ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • Jeffrey White
  • Andrew J. Tabler
  • Aaron Y. Zelin
Brief Analysis
Inside the Complex World of U.S. Military Assistance to Egypt
Under current conditions, suspending military assistance to Cairo would be counterproductive for U.S. interests and contractors alike.
۴ سپتامبر ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • David Schenker
Brief Analysis
Linking Targets to Political Objectives in Syria
If the United States strikes, it needs to choose targets and weapon systems based on a strategic plan that is well explained to the world.
۳۰ اوت ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • Chandler Atwood
  • Michael Knights
Brief Analysis
Striking Syria: Lessons from the Israeli Experience
Israel's lessons from numerous strikes in Syria show that Assad can be deterred, particularly if he loses significant assets in a strike marked by clear, realistic objectives, careful planning, and credible deterrent messages after the fact.
۳۰ اوت ۲۰۱۳
◆
  • Michael Herzog

Pagination

  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • First page « First
  • …
  • Page 102
  • Page 103
  • Page 104
  • Page 105
  • Current page 106
  • Page 107
  • Page 108
  • Page 109
  • Page 110
  • …
  • Last page Last »
  • Next page Next ›
Supported by the

Military and Security Studies Program

The Washington Institute's Military and Security Studies Program has established itself as an unrivaled source of reliable, incisive, and forward-looking analysis concerning several of the most critical national-security challenges facing the United States today: The U.S. military role in the Middle East, Iran's nuclear program and its proxy armies, the ongoing conflict is in Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen, the regional proliferation of missiles and weapons of mass destruction, the security dimensions of the Arab-Israeli conflict, and many other security issues on the frontline of the U.S. policymaking agenda.

Sign Up for Email Updates from The Washington Institute

Never miss a breaking event on U.S. policy interests in the Middle East. Customize your subscription to our expert analysis, op-eds, live events, and special reports.

Sign up

Featured experts

Michael Eisenstadt
مایکل آیزنستات
مایکل آیزنستات هموند دیوید کان و داگلاس کان و مدیر برنامه مطالعات امنیتی و نظامی انستیو واشنگتن است.
Grant Rumley
گرانت راملی
گرانت راملی هموند ارشد انستیتو واشنگتن و مشاور سابق سیاست‌گذاری خاورمیانه در دفتر وزیر دفاع است.
Elizabeth Dent - source: The Washington Institute
Elizabeth Dent
Elizabeth Dent is the Nathan and Esther K. Wagner Senior Fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, where she focuses on U.S. foreign and defense policy toward the Gulf states, Iraq, and Syria.
Background image with TWI branding
logo
wordmark
Homepage

1111 19th Street NW - Suite 500
Washington D.C. 20036
Tel: 202-452-0650
Fax: 202-223-5364

Footer contact links

  • تماس
  • اتاق خبر
  • Subscribe

هدف انستیتو واشنگتن، تعمیق درکی متعادل و واقع‌بینانه از منافع آمریکا در خاورمیانه و نیز پیشبردِ سیاست‌هایی برای حفظ آن منافع است.

انستیتو واشنگتن یک سازمان غیرانتفاعی دارای مجوز 501(c)3 است که تمامی کمک‌های مالی به آن شامل معافیت مالیاتی خواهد شد.

Footer quick links

  • درباره انستیتو واشنگتن
  • پشتیبانی از انستیتو
  • Alumni

Social media

  • The Washington Institute on Facebook facebook
  • The Washington Institute on X x
  • The Washington Institute on YouTube youtube
  • The Washington Institute on LinkedIn linkedin

© 2025 کلیه حقوق محفوظ است

Footer

  • استخدام
  • حریم خصوصی
  • حقوق و مجوزها