Skip to main content
TWI logo The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
logo
wordmark
Homepage

Main navigation

  • تحلیل‌ها
  • کارشناسان
  • درباره‌ما
  • پشتیبانی
  • نقشه و چند رسانه‌ای
مباحث روز :
  • نظامی و امنیتی
  • منع اشاعه
  • اسرائیل
  • ایران
  • لبنان
  • سوریه

منطقه‌ها و کشورها

  • اردن
  • اسرائیل
  • ایران
  • ترکیه
  • خاورمیانه
  • سوریه
  • شمال آفریقا
  • عراق
  • فلسطینی‌ها
  • لبنان
  • مصر
  • کشورهای حاشیه‌خلیج فارس

موضوع

  • انرژی و اقتصاد
  • تروریسم
  • خلیج و سیاست حوزه انرژی
  • دمکراسی و اصلاح
  • رقابت قدرت‌های بزرگ
  • روابط عرب و اسرائیل
  • سیاست آمریکا
  • عرب و اسلام سیاسی
  • فرایند صلح
  • منع اشاعه
  • نظامی و امنیتی
TWI English
TWI Arabic: اللغة العربية Fikra Forum

سیاست آمریکا

Policy Analysis on سیاست آمریکا

Filter by:

Articles & Testimony
If the Iran Deal Fails...
Congressional rejection of the nuclear deal wouldn't be pretty, but a messy domestic political battle is a far cry from the president's warnings of potential war with Iran.
۱۶ ژوئیهٔ ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • Robert Satloff
Articles & Testimony
How Will the Iran Nuclear Deal Affect Broader U.S. Strategy?
If the administration cannot convincingly describe a regional strategy into which the agreement fits, allies and skeptics are likely to assume an unspoken U.S. realignment or simple incoherence.
۱۵ ژوئیهٔ ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • Michael Singh
Articles & Testimony
What's Really Wrong with the Iran Nuclear Deal
Tactically, the impressively detailed Iran nuclear accord masks major flaws; strategically, it heralds a profound shift in U.S. regional strategy.
۱۴ ژوئیهٔ ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • Robert Satloff
Articles & Testimony
Iran Deal Leaves U.S. With Tough Questions
The deal with Iran is finally done. Given the stakes, it should be scrutinized. It makes sense to reserve judgment and see how the administration explains all the clauses of the agreement and how they will be implemented. While I look forward to the administration's full explanation of the deal
۱۴ ژوئیهٔ ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • Dennis Ross
Articles & Testimony
Keeping Iran's Feet to the Fire
Even with a deal now signed, the Obama administration still has many tools for countering Iran’s menacing behavior across the Middle East.
۱۴ ژوئیهٔ ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • David Makovsky
  • Matthew Levitt
Articles & Testimony
U.S.-GCC Relations: Closing the Credibility Gap
The additional steps promised at the Camp David summit do not constitute a game-changer in U.S.-GCC relations, especially since the Joint Statement is so vague regarding specific steps to counter Iran's destabilizing activities.
۹ ژوئیهٔ ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • Michael Eisenstadt
In-Depth Reports
Public Statement on U.S. Policy Toward the Iran Nuclear Negotiations
Endorsed by a Bipartisan Group of American Diplomats, Legislators, Policymakers, and Experts
Over the last three years, members of this bipartisan group have convened regularly under the auspices of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy to discuss the status of the Iran nuclear issue, frequently benefitting from the input of current Administration officials. Last week, at its most recent meeting, the
۲۴ ژوئن ۲۰۱۵
Articles & Testimony
Aligning Means and Ends, Policies and Strategy in the War on ISIL
The means-ends mismatch in Washington's approach to ISIL is a function of several problems, including inadequate commitment of resources, the jihadist group's resilience, the weakness of America's regional partners, and the incoherence of current U.S. strategy.
۲۴ ژوئن ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • Michael Eisenstadt
Articles & Testimony
Don't Let the Deadline Drive the Deal
To get the best nuclear pact with Iran, Washington might have to let the June 30 target slide.
۱۹ ژوئن ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • Dennis Ross
Articles & Testimony
The War Against ISIL: In Search of a Viable Strategy
Washington has several options beyond a major ground commitment, including more drones and special forces in Iraq, a true effort to arm and organize the Syrian opposition, and a willingness to recognize longer-term regional threats posed by al-Qaeda affiliates and Iran.
۱۵ ژوئن ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
The Administration Should Not Meet With the Muslim Brotherhood in Washington
Washington should avoid engaging an organization that calls for "jihad" and "martyrdom" in fighting a strategic ally.
۵ ژوئن ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • Eric Trager
Articles & Testimony
Why Drip-Feeding U.S. Support Won't Work in Iraq
Without more decisive steps and a greater commitment of forces, the United States cannot expect to achieve its goals against the Islamic State.
۵ ژوئن ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • Michael Knights
Articles & Testimony
Implications of the Iran Nuclear Agreement for U.S. Policy in the Middle East
Any agreement should be judged not only by its verifiable nuclear restraints, but also by the credibility of U.S. readiness to contain the regime's asymmetrical military, ideological, religious, economic, and diplomatic moves in the region.
۳ ژوئن ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • James Jeffrey
In-Depth Reports
Contextualizing Israeli Concerns about the Iran Nuclear Deal
Few issues have so polarized U.S. and Israeli leaders as the prospective accord with Iran regarding its nuclear program. Between Obama’s “historic opportunity” and Netanyahu’s “historic mistake” lie differing threat perceptions, divergent worldviews and regional assessments, and a deep deficit of trust. From an Israeli perspective, the U.S. administration has
۲ ژوئن ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • Michael Herzog
Articles & Testimony
Ramadi 2015 vs. Burma 1942: Spin vs. Grit
The blame game appears so blatant that one might even conclude the administration is intent on throwing in the towel against ISIS.
۱ ژوئن ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • James Jeffrey
Articles & Testimony
A Policy to Defeat Both ISIL and Iran
The Middle East state system is under relentless pressure, and preserving it will require a long-term vision for shoring up U.S. allies, rolling back ISIL, and countering the Iranians.
۲۶ مهٔ ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • Samuel Berger
  • Stephen Hadley
  • James Jeffrey
  • Dennis Ross
  • Robert Satloff
In-Depth Reports
Deterring an Iranian Nuclear Breakout
Whether or not the P5+1 and Tehran reach a nuclear deal, deterring an Iranian breakout, most likely at clandestine sites, will remain a core U.S. imperative for the foreseeable future. Although the U.S. intelligence community has a strong record of detecting clandestine nuclear programs, it has often failed to correctly
۲۰ مهٔ ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • Michael Eisenstadt
Articles & Testimony
Egypt Two Years After Morsi
Although the Obama administration is right to be concerned about Egypt's domestic political trajectory, conditioning the bilateral strategic relationship on Cairo's progress toward democracy will only make matters worse under the current circumstances.
۲۰ مهٔ ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • Eric Trager
Articles & Testimony
A Big Win for Kurds at the White House
The Kurds have made a conscious effort to step back from a damaging feud with the United States over weapons shipments.
۱۵ مهٔ ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • Michael Knights
Articles & Testimony
Responding to Iranian Naval Aggression in the Persian Gulf
The latest provocation reinforces the need for any nuclear agreement with Iran to include strong enforcement mechanisms and swift and severe penalties for cheating.
۱۵ مهٔ ۲۰۱۵
◆
  • Michael Singh

Pagination

  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • First page « First
  • …
  • Page 62
  • Page 63
  • Page 64
  • Page 65
  • Current page 66
  • Page 67
  • Page 68
  • Page 69
  • Page 70
  • …
  • Last page Last »
  • Next page Next ›
Supported by the

Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation Program on Great Power Competition and the Middle East

The Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation Program on Great Power Competition and the Middle East focuses on the region as a setting for heightened competition between the United States and other world powers, such as China and Russia.

Sign Up for Email Updates from The Washington Institute

Never miss a breaking event on U.S. policy interests in the Middle East. Customize your subscription to our expert analysis, op-eds, live events, and special reports.

Sign up

Featured experts

Robert Satloff - source: The Washington Institute
رابرت ستلوف
رابرت ستلوف مدیر اجرایی انستیتو واشنگتن است. ستلوف کارشناس سیاست‌ عربی و اسلامی است و در زمینه روند صلح اعراب و اسرائیل، چالش اسلام سیاسی و ضرورت اصلاح دیپلماسی عمومی ایالات متحده در خاورمیانه مطالب زیادی منتشر کرده است.
Ambassador Dennis Ross
دنیس راس
سفیر دنیس راس، دستیار ویژه پیشین پرزیدنت باراک اوباما، مشاور انستیتو و هموند برجسته ویلیام دیویدسون در انستیتو واشنگتن است.
Dana Stroul
دانا استرول

دانا استرول مدیر پژوهش و پژوهشگر شلی و مایکل کاسن در موسسه واشینگتن برای سیاست خاور نزدیک است، سمت‌هایی که او در فوریه 2024 به عهده گرفت. او پس از یک دوره خدمت دولتی از 2021 تا 2023 به عنوان معاون دستیار وزیر دفاع برای امور خاورمیانه، یعنی بالاترین مقام غیرنظامی پنتاگون در رابطه با منطقه، بار دیگر به این موسسه پیوسته است. او در وزارت دفاع، رهبری شکل دادن و اجرای سیاست دفاعی ایالات متحده در منطقه را در یک دوره پرتلاطم برعهده داشت، دوره‌ای که شامل سرعت بخشیدن به ابتکارات پدافند یکپارچه هوایی و دریایی، رسیدگی به فعالیت‌های بی‌ثبات‌کننده ایران، تدوین رویکرد ایالات متحده در رقابت استراتژیک، حفظ

Michael Singh
مایکل سینگ
مایکل سینگ هموند پژوهشی ارشد لین-سویگ (Lane-Swig) و مدیرعامل انستیتو واشنگتن ‌است
Background image with TWI branding
logo
wordmark
Homepage

1111 19th Street NW - Suite 500
Washington D.C. 20036
Tel: 202-452-0650
Fax: 202-223-5364

Footer contact links

  • تماس
  • اتاق خبر
  • Subscribe

هدف انستیتو واشنگتن، تعمیق درکی متعادل و واقع‌بینانه از منافع آمریکا در خاورمیانه و نیز پیشبردِ سیاست‌هایی برای حفظ آن منافع است.

انستیتو واشنگتن یک سازمان غیرانتفاعی دارای مجوز 501(c)3 است که تمامی کمک‌های مالی به آن شامل معافیت مالیاتی خواهد شد.

Footer quick links

  • درباره انستیتو واشنگتن
  • پشتیبانی از انستیتو
  • Alumni

Social media

  • The Washington Institute on Facebook facebook
  • The Washington Institute on X x
  • The Washington Institute on YouTube youtube
  • The Washington Institute on LinkedIn linkedin

© 2025 کلیه حقوق محفوظ است

Footer

  • استخدام
  • حریم خصوصی
  • حقوق و مجوزها