سیاست آمریکا

Policy Analysis on سیاست آمریکا

How to Put Some Teeth into the Nuclear Deal with Iran

Now is the time for the president to state clearly that if Iran dashes toward a weapon, especially after year 15 of the deal, it will trigger the use of force.

۲۵ اوت ۲۰۱۵

◆

Dennis Ross
David Petraeus

Articles & Testimony

Bring Back Bright Star

As the Obama administration searches for ways to maintain deterrence in the Persian Gulf, this biannual military exercise represents a high-reward, low-risk option.

۲۱ اوت ۲۰۱۵

◆

Gilad Wenig
Eric Trager

Brief Analysis

Will the Obama Administration Implement the Stringent Sanctions Authorized Under the Iran Agreement?

Even after the deal is in effect, the United States can sustain or increase tough barriers on Iran's trade with other countries, but this fact has not been highlighted by the president or his team.

۲۱ اوت ۲۰۱۵

◆

Patrick Clawson

Articles & Testimony

How Is the War Against the Islamic State Going? 10 Expert Opinions

In a recent compilation, two Institute fellows shared their views on the situation in Iraq. Read the full set of remarks on the Musings on Iraq website. Michael Knights Speaking just about Iraq, which is clearly only one segment of the broader war, any assessment of the current level of

۲۰ اوت ۲۰۱۵

◆

Michael Knights
Aaron Y. Zelin

Brief Analysis

Rethinking U.S. Strategy for Intercepting Iranian Arms Transfers

Existing mechanisms for interdicting Iran's arms shipments to its proxies have already been proven insufficient, so any concerted effort to push back against the flow of weapons will require additional measures.

۲۰ اوت ۲۰۱۵

◆

Nadav Pollak

Articles & Testimony

No Room for Improvement

There are several potential reasons why the Obama administration is still insisting that the nuclear deal is perfect as is, and most of them are deeply problematic.

۱۹ اوت ۲۰۱۵

◆

Robert Satloff

Articles & Testimony

Answering Rob Eshman's Questions on the Iran Deal

The bottom line is that if lawmakers are concerned about the nuclear agreement's flaws and are hungry for the administration to take sensible measures to fix them, the limited downside of voting no is greatly exceeded by the benefits of 'a better deal.'

۱۷ اوت ۲۰۱۵

◆

Robert Satloff

Articles & Testimony

There Is a Path to a Better Deal with Iran

Because a 'no' vote on the Iran deal would have little practical impact until next year, lawmakers have time to work with the president on making reasonable fixes to the agreement even if they disapprove it in the short term.

۱۳ اوت ۲۰۱۵

◆

Robert Satloff

Articles & Testimony

When Multilateralism Met Realism -- and Tried to Make an Iran Deal

If realist opponents of the Iran agreement insist that the JCPOA must go, they will need to explain in detail how the limited alternatives at Washington's disposal are worth the profound risks of killing the current deal.

۱۱ اوت ۲۰۱۵

◆

James Jeffrey

Brief Analysis

Clarifying a 'No' Vote on the Iran Nuclear Agreement

A congressional vote of disapproval would not necessarily be a deal breaker; in fact, it could give the administration time to improve the agreement or implement other policy measures that more effectively secure U.S. interests.

۱۰ اوت ۲۰۱۵

◆

Robert Satloff

Articles & Testimony

Implications of the JCPOA for U.S. Policy in the Middle East

The Institute's managing director testified before two Senate hearings to discuss the drawbacks of the current Iran agreement, the best means of addressing them, and the implications for U.S. policy if they are not fixed.

۵ اوت ۲۰۱۵

◆

Michael Singh

President Barack Obama speaks at the White House alongside Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry

Brief Analysis

Nuclear Deal or More? A Survey of Official U.S. Statements on the Iran Agreement

While the administration's statements are largely framed as realistic optimism about containing the nuclear program, some allies may worry that its comments on improving U.S.-Iranian relations are too aspirational.

۴ اوت ۲۰۱۵

◆

Patrick Schmidt

Brief Analysis

Resumption of U.S.-Egypt Strategic Dialogue

Cairo and Washington both see the upcoming dialogue as a means of signaling that political disagreements will not torpedo the core relationship anytime soon.

۳۱ ژوئیهٔ ۲۰۱۵

◆

Eric Trager
Eitan Sayag

Articles & Testimony

The Nuclear Deal with Iran: Regional Implications

While the agreement has a number of significant flaws, at least some can be rectified by various mitigation measures, provided the president is willing to commit to an effective implementation strategy.

۲۹ ژوئیهٔ ۲۰۱۵

◆

Michael Eisenstadt

Articles & Testimony

Potential Regional Implications of the Iran Deal

The agreement does not clearly achieve its main objective of preventing a nuclear-armed Iran, nor does it complement America's broader strategies regarding the Middle East and global nonproliferation.

۲۹ ژوئیهٔ ۲۰۱۵

◆

Michael Singh

Articles & Testimony

Why Jonathan Pollard's Release Means Little

Given the current state of the region, close U.S.-Israeli security and intelligence cooperation is more vital than ever, but repairing the rift between the two governments will require much more than symbolic gestures.

۲۸ ژوئیهٔ ۲۰۱۵

◆

David Makovsky

Articles & Testimony

If the Iran Deal Fails...

Congressional rejection of the nuclear deal wouldn't be pretty, but a messy domestic political battle is a far cry from the president's warnings of potential war with Iran.

۱۶ ژوئیهٔ ۲۰۱۵

◆

Robert Satloff

Articles & Testimony

How Will the Iran Nuclear Deal Affect Broader U.S. Strategy?

If the administration cannot convincingly describe a regional strategy into which the agreement fits, allies and skeptics are likely to assume an unspoken U.S. realignment or simple incoherence.

۱۵ ژوئیهٔ ۲۰۱۵

◆

Michael Singh

Articles & Testimony

What's Really Wrong with the Iran Nuclear Deal

Tactically, the impressively detailed Iran nuclear accord masks major flaws; strategically, it heralds a profound shift in U.S. regional strategy.

۱۴ ژوئیهٔ ۲۰۱۵

◆

Robert Satloff

Articles & Testimony

Iran Deal Leaves U.S. With Tough Questions

The deal with Iran is finally done. Given the stakes, it should be scrutinized. It makes sense to reserve judgment and see how the administration explains all the clauses of the agreement and how they will be implemented. While I look forward to the administration's full explanation of the deal

۱۴ ژوئیهٔ ۲۰۱۵

◆

Dennis Ross

Supported by the

Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation Program on Great Power Competition and the Middle East

The Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation Program on Great Power Competition and the Middle East focuses on the region as a setting for heightened competition between the United States and other world powers, such as China and Russia.

Never miss a breaking event on U.S. policy interests in the Middle East. Customize your subscription to our expert analysis, op-eds, live events, and special reports.

Featured experts

Robert Satloff - source: The Washington Institute

رابرت ستلوف

رابرت ستلوف مدیر اجرایی انستیتو واشنگتن است. ستلوف کارشناس سیاست‌ عربی و اسلامی است و در زمینه روند صلح اعراب و اسرائیل، چالش اسلام سیاسی و ضرورت اصلاح دیپلماسی عمومی ایالات متحده در خاورمیانه مطالب زیادی منتشر کرده است.

دنیس راس

سفیر دنیس راس، دستیار ویژه پیشین پرزیدنت باراک اوباما، مشاور انستیتو و هموند برجسته ویلیام دیویدسون در انستیتو واشنگتن است.

مایکل سینگ

مایکل سینگ هموند پژوهشی ارشد لین-سویگ (Lane-Swig) و مدیرعامل انستیتو واشنگتن ‌است

منطقه‌ها و کشورها

موضوع

سیاست آمریکا

Policy Analysis on سیاست آمریکا

Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation Program on Great Power Competition and the Middle East

Featured experts

منطقه‌ها و کشورها

موضوع

سیاست آمریکا

Policy Analysis on سیاست آمریکا

Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation Program on Great Power Competition and the Middle East

Sign Up for Email Updates from The Washington Institute

Featured experts