Skip to main content
TWI logo The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
logo
wordmark
Homepage

Main navigation

  • تحلیل‌ها
  • کارشناسان
  • درباره‌ما
  • پشتیبانی
  • نقشه و چند رسانه‌ای
مباحث روز :
  • نظامی و امنیتی
  • منع اشاعه
  • اسرائیل
  • ایران
  • لبنان
  • سوریه

منطقه‌ها و کشورها

  • اردن
  • اسرائیل
  • ایران
  • ترکیه
  • خاورمیانه
  • سوریه
  • شمال آفریقا
  • عراق
  • فلسطینی‌ها
  • لبنان
  • مصر
  • کشورهای حاشیه‌خلیج فارس

موضوع

  • انرژی و اقتصاد
  • تروریسم
  • خلیج و سیاست حوزه انرژی
  • دمکراسی و اصلاح
  • رقابت قدرت‌های بزرگ
  • روابط عرب و اسرائیل
  • سیاست آمریکا
  • عرب و اسلام سیاسی
  • فرایند صلح
  • منع اشاعه
  • نظامی و امنیتی
TWI English
TWI Arabic: اللغة العربية Fikra Forum

منع اشاعه

Policy Analysis on منع اشاعه

Filter by:

Should We Fear Mideast Nuclear Proliferation?
If Iran gets nuclear weapons, will other Middle East states want them too? In a bloggingheads.tv conversation, Matt Duss and Michael Singh explore the issues.
۱۳ آوریل ۲۰۱۲
◆
  • Michael Singh
Brief Analysis
The Challenge of Containing Iran's Enrichment Activities
With talks between the P5+1 (the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France, and Germany) and Iran set to resume in Istanbul on April 13, officials are discussing possible compromises that might persuade Tehran to give up any ambition of developing nuclear weapons. Apparently, one of the principal components of these
۱۲ آوریل ۲۰۱۲
◆
  • Simon Henderson
  • Olli Heinonen
Brief Analysis
What Iran Might Gain from a Nuclear Deal
If Iran decides to seriously negotiate during upcoming nuclear talks -- currently scheduled to begin this weekend in Istanbul -- what might it expect to gain from the resultant deal? Probably not much, because even a comprehensive agreement on nuclear issues would not close the profound geostrategic split between Washington
۱۱ آوریل ۲۰۱۲
◆
  • Patrick Clawson
Articles & Testimony
Squandered Leverage over Iran
If Washington does not maintain pressure on Iran, it will validate the regime's strategy of defiance, provocation, and delay.
۱۰ آوریل ۲۰۱۲
◆
  • Michael Singh
Brief Analysis
What Could Diplomacy with Iran Produce?
There can be little doubt that the United States, France, Britain, Germany, Russia, and China would all prefer a diplomatic outcome to the impasse over Iran's nuclear ambitions. Collectively, they make up the P5+1 mechanism that will soon resume negotiations with Iranian representatives. Talks were discontinued last year because Tehran's
۵ آوریل ۲۰۱۲
◆
  • Dennis Ross
Articles & Testimony
The U.S. Can Meet Israel Halfway on Iran
There is no daylight between the United States and Israel on the objective and the preferred means for dealing with Iranian nuclear ambitions. Much has been written about possible differences, but the recent meeting between President Obama and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu highlighted key points of convergence: Both agree that
۲ آوریل ۲۰۱۲
◆
  • Dennis Ross
  • David Makovsky
Brief Analysis
Dateline Middle East: Trip Reports from around the Region
On March 27, 2012, Robert Satloff, Andrew J. Tabler, and Simon Henderson addressed a Policy Forum at The Washington Institute. Dr. Satloff, the Institute's executive director and Howard P. Berkowitz chair in U.S. Middle East policy, had just returned from Israel and Jordan. Mr. Tabler, the Institute's Next Generation fellow
۲۹ مارس ۲۰۱۲
◆
  • Robert Satloff
  • Andrew J. Tabler
  • Simon Henderson
Brief Analysis
Iran Keeps Compromise Option Open
Whether by choice or through the military's influence, Ayatollah Khamenei has decided to keep a formerly marginalized regime figure -- and, by extension, the possibility of nuclear compromise -- in play.
۲۲ مارس ۲۰۱۲
◆
  • Mehdi Khalaji
Articles & Testimony
To Keep the Peace with Iran, Threaten to Strike
Washington must clearly articulate what its red lines are in terms of Iranian behavior and credibly threaten the regime with military action should it cross them.
۲۰ مارس ۲۰۱۲
◆
  • Michael Singh
Brief Analysis
Washington and Israel on Iran: Unresolved Differences
Notwithstanding their differing perspectives on the subject, the less daylight seen between Washington and Israel regarding Iran, the better.
۱۶ مارس ۲۰۱۲
◆
  • Michael Herzog
Articles & Testimony
No Nuclear Compromise
The Iranian regime will not be able to survive existing sanctions, which are targeting the banking system and oil industry like never before.
۷ مارس ۲۰۱۲
◆
  • Mehdi Khalaji
Articles & Testimony
Avoiding a Bad Nuclear Deal with Iran
As the confrontation with Iran enters a new, more dangerous phase, Washington must avoid the temptation of redefining its red lines in a manner that endangers national security.
۷ مارس ۲۰۱۲
◆
  • Michael Singh
Brief Analysis
President Obama on Iran: Assessing Key Passages in the AIPAC Speech
Although the president's AIPAC speech offered reassurances that he is committed to the full logic of a "prevention" strategy in dealing with the Iranian nuclear challenge, including potential military action, it also implied a clear preference for Israel to hold back and let the noose of international sanctions tighten.
۵ مارس ۲۰۱۲
◆
  • Robert Satloff
Brief Analysis
The Need for Consistent U.S. and Israeli Public Messaging on Iran
Washington and Israel need to address their public messaging on Iran, which has undermined mutual trust and efforts to achieve their common objective: a diplomatic solution to the nuclear crisis.
۲ مارس ۲۰۱۲
◆
  • Michael Eisenstadt
  • David Makovsky
Articles & Testimony
Is the Iranian Regime Rational?
Although some examples suggest rational decisionmaking by Tehran, other Iranian actions seem unencumbered by cost-benefit considerations.
۲۳ فوریهٔ ۲۰۱۲
◆
  • Michael Singh
Articles & Testimony
Friendship Under Fire
The Iranian nuclear threat will challenge Obama and Netanyahu's sometimes-rocky relationship like never before.
۲۲ فوریهٔ ۲۰۱۲
◆
  • David Makovsky
Articles & Testimony
Iran Is Ready to Talk
Speculation about an Israeli strike against Iranian nuclear facilities is rife, but there is little discussion about whether diplomacy can still succeed, precluding the need for military action. Many experts doubt that Tehran would ever accept a deal that uses intrusive inspections and denies or limits uranium enrichment to halt
۱۵ فوریهٔ ۲۰۱۲
◆
  • Dennis Ross
Articles & Testimony
On Iran, Pressure Works
Washington and its allies can still prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons through nonmilitary means.
۲۴ دسامبر ۲۰۱۱
◆
  • Dennis Ross
Articles & Testimony
Israel Is Wide Awake as Decision Time Approaches on Nuclear Iran
Far from sleepwalking into war with Iran, Israelis have their eyes wide open on the nuclear threat and expect others to do the same.
۲۲ دسامبر ۲۰۱۱
◆
  • Michael Herzog
Multimedia
In-Depth Reports
An Iranian Nuclear Breakout Is Not Inevitable
Much of the rhetoric surrounding the Iranian nuclear impasse has been marked by Tehran's staunch refusal to budge and pessimism among Western analysts that increasingly strong diplomatic and economic measures will ever have their desired effect. Yet several avenues for progress have opened up amid an environment of incrementally effective
۲۰ دسامبر ۲۰۱۱
◆
  • Patrick Clawson

Pagination

  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • First page « First
  • …
  • Page 36
  • Page 37
  • Page 38
  • Page 39
  • Current page 40
  • Page 41
  • Page 42
  • Page 43
  • Page 44
  • …
  • Last page Last »
  • Next page Next ›

Sign Up for Email Updates from The Washington Institute

Never miss a breaking event on U.S. policy interests in the Middle East. Customize your subscription to our expert analysis, op-eds, live events, and special reports.

Sign up

Featured experts

Patrick Clawson
پاتریک کلاوسون
عضو ارشد و مدیرتحقیقات انستیتو واشنگتن برای سیاست خاور نزدیک
Michael Singh
مایکل سینگ
مایکل سینگ هموند پژوهشی ارشد لین-سویگ (Lane-Swig) و مدیرعامل انستیتو واشنگتن ‌است
Simon Henderson
سایمون هندرسون
Background image with TWI branding
logo
wordmark
Homepage

1111 19th Street NW - Suite 500
Washington D.C. 20036
Tel: 202-452-0650
Fax: 202-223-5364

Footer contact links

  • تماس
  • اتاق خبر
  • Subscribe

هدف انستیتو واشنگتن، تعمیق درکی متعادل و واقع‌بینانه از منافع آمریکا در خاورمیانه و نیز پیشبردِ سیاست‌هایی برای حفظ آن منافع است.

انستیتو واشنگتن یک سازمان غیرانتفاعی دارای مجوز 501(c)3 است که تمامی کمک‌های مالی به آن شامل معافیت مالیاتی خواهد شد.

Footer quick links

  • درباره انستیتو واشنگتن
  • پشتیبانی از انستیتو
  • Alumni

Social media

  • The Washington Institute on Facebook facebook
  • The Washington Institute on X x
  • The Washington Institute on YouTube youtube
  • The Washington Institute on LinkedIn linkedin

© 2025 کلیه حقوق محفوظ است

Footer

  • استخدام
  • حریم خصوصی
  • حقوق و مجوزها