Skip to main content

The Washington Institute for Near East Policy

Main navigation

تحلیل‌ها
کارشناسان
درباره‌ما
پشتیبانی
نقشه و چند رسانه‌ای

مباحث روز :

نظامی و امنیتی
منع اشاعه

اسرائیل
ایران
لبنان
سوریه

منطقه‌ها و کشورها

اردن
اسرائیل
ایران
ترکیه
خاورمیانه
سوریه
شمال آفریقا
عراق
فلسطینی‌ها
لبنان
مصر
کشورهای حاشیه‌خلیج فارس

موضوع

انرژی و اقتصاد
تروریسم
خلیج و سیاست حوزه انرژی
دمکراسی و اصلاح
رقابت قدرت‌های بزرگ
روابط عرب و اسرائیل
سیاست آمریکا
عرب و اسلام سیاسی
فرایند صلح
منع اشاعه
نظامی و امنیتی

TWI Arabic: اللغة العربية Fikra Forum

Search Policy Analysis

سیاست آمریکا

Policy Analysis on سیاست آمریکا

Filter by:

Keyword

Region

Type

Would U.S. Membership Help the Peace Process?

What Is MENABANK? The idea for a regional development bank in the Middle East has been around for years. However, practical work for creation of a bank only began when the four core peace process parties—Israel, the Palestinian Authority, Jordan, and Egypt—jointly proposed the creation of the Bank in 1995

۲۰ مارس ۱۹۹۸

Articles & Testimony

Developments in the Middle East

Testimony before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Subcommittee on Near East and South Asian Affairs Mr. Chairman, It is an honor to participate in this timely and important hearing on a subject of vital national interest. I thank you for the opportunity to present my views to this Committee

۱۱ مارس ۱۹۹۸

Robert Satloff

U.S. Objectives in Iraq:

Rollback vs. Containment

The terms rollback and containment surfaced during the Cold War. Rollback was always preferred to containment, but until Ronald Reagan's success in the 1980's, the Soviets were too strong. For this reason, the United States essentially settled for containment during the Cold War. By contrast, Iraq has a regime that

۶ مارس ۱۹۹۸

Assessing the UN-Iraq Accord:

Impact on Iraq, UNSCOM, and U.S. Policy

The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed by United Nations (UN) Secretary General Kofi Annan and Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz marks a turning point in the approach of the international community toward the regime of Saddam Hussein, and the activities of the UN Special Commission (UNSCOM) and International Atomic

۲۴ فوریهٔ ۱۹۹۸

Michael Eisenstadt

The U.S. Role in the Peace Process:

Amid continuing difficulties in the Palestinian-Israeli peace process, focus has shifted to the role of the United States. There is a good deal of confusion concerning what the United States can and cannot do. The evolving role of the United States can be examined through a number of specific and

۱۷ فوریهٔ ۱۹۹۸

Articles & Testimony

The Case for Hitting Hard at Saddam

Now that a broad consensus has emerged in government circles on the need to use force against Saddam Hussein, Washington should stay the course. It should not be deterred by last-minute Russian or French diplomacy, by inconclusive United Nations debates or-perhaps the biggest obstacle of all-by its own self-doubts. Iraq

۸ فوریهٔ ۱۹۹۸

Alan Makovsky

Khatemi's Dialogue with America, Not with Washington

Iranian President Mohammad Khatemi's January 7 interview on CNN was long on history but short on policy indicatives. The most striking aspect of was that he gave it, not what he said. Khatemi is staking his prestige on foreign policy, which is surprising from a man whose entire career and

۸ ژانویهٔ ۱۹۹۸

Patrick Clawson

Articles & Testimony

The Clinton Doctrine

Bill Clinton, the first post Cold War president, may be joining a select Cold War club. Since World War II, several presidents have had foreign policy axioms associated with their names: the Truman Doctrine, which launched containment; the Carter Doctrine, declaring the Persian Gulf a vital interest: the Reagan Doctrine

۲۸ دسامبر ۱۹۹۷

Patrick Clawson

A Euro-Battered Mr. Yilmaz Comes to Washington

On the heels of the European Union's dismissal of Turkey's membership bid, Turkish Prime Minister Mesut Yilmaz meets President Clinton at the White House tomorrow at a potentially fateful time for Turkey's relations with the West. Ultimately, Euro-Turkish relations need to be strengthened if Turkey is to be fully integrated

۱۸ دسامبر ۱۹۹۷

Alan Makovsky

Dual Containment:

Revive It or Replace It?

Washington must face the problem that both the large powers in the Persian Gulf-Iran and Iraq-have regimes unwilling to live in peace with their neighbors or the United States. Several approaches to these vexatious regimes tried by the West have been unsuccessful. Both the reliance on a regional power to

۱۸ دسامبر ۱۹۹۷

Patrick Clawson

Prospects for Dialogue with Iran:

Implications for U.S. Policy

When Mohammed Khatemi was unexpectedly elected president in May 1997, he was called in Iran "Ayatollah Gorbachev," in the expectation the system could fall apart if it opened up. While it is too early too ascertain whether Khatemi's welcome rhetoric is matched by substantive changes in Iranian behavior, his recent

۱۶ دسامبر ۱۹۹۷

Patrick Clawson

The Blair Government and the Middle East

British policy toward the Middle East has assumed greater relevance in the international arena due to the growing relationship between Washington and the new Blair administration as well as the British accession to the European Union (EU) presidency in January 1998. Stagnation in the Peace Process. Politicians, diplomats, and all

۳ دسامبر ۱۹۹۷

Articles & Testimony

Business Follows Stability

In the Middle East, money talks -- but not as loudly as politics. That's the lesson to be learned from the Middle East/North Africa economic summit, which concluded late last month in Doha, Qatar, under the shadow of the Iraq crisis. For Washington, the two events are connected, with the

۱ دسامبر ۱۹۹۷

The Iraq Outcome:

A Hollow Victory for U.S. Policy

To the Clinton Administration, the Iraq crisis appears headed toward a satisfactory outcome. As a result of the UN Security Council's unanimous condemnation of Iraq and imposition of additional (if modest) new sanctions, Saddam seems to have succumbed to the will of the international community, with UNSCOM inspectors soon returning

۲۰ نوامبر ۱۹۹۷

Robert Satloff

The Crisis with Iraq:

Options for U.S. Policy

Saddam Husayn probably had several motives in seeking to disrupt UN weapons inspections. First, he sought to undermine the effectiveness of the UN weapons inspectors, if not expel them altogether, because they are the main obstacle to his efforts to transform Iraq into a regional power. Second, Saddam currently has

۱۸ نوامبر ۱۹۹۷

Michael Eisenstadt
Kenneth Pollack

Removing Syria from the Narcotics List:

A Signal to Damascus?

In a region where subtle messages often serve as political discourse, the Clinton Administration may be communicating to Syria that the United States is changing its approach to Damascus. One step the Administration is considering is especially likely to send such a signal: declaring that Syria is no longer a

۱۰ نوامبر ۱۹۹۷

Between Words and Action:

Gaps in U.S. Counter-Terrorism Policy

The growing confrontation between the United Nations and Iraq focuses on American participation in U.N. weapons inspections. However, this crisis with a charter member of the State Department's list of state-sponsors of international terrorism can also be viewed through the prism of Washington's flagging efforts to contain rogue states, in

۴ نوامبر ۱۹۹۷

Responding to Iraq:

Crises and Opportunities

On Wednesday, Iraq announced that the American inspectors of the United Nations Special Commission on Iraq (UNSCOM) had one week to leave the country. For good measure, Baghdad demanded that UNSCOM cease using American U-2 spy planes as part of its efforts to enforce the dismantling of Iraq's weapons of

۳۱ اکتبر ۱۹۹۷

Kenneth Pollack

U.S. Policy and Chinese Proliferation to Iran:

A Small Leap Forward?

Iran has been a key issue in this week's U.S.-China summit. Two weeks ago, Beijing promised to halt the transfer of antiship missiles to Iran and, in the run-up to the summit, the Chinese provided written assurances to Washington that it will not initiate any new nuclear cooperation with Iran

۳۱ اکتبر ۱۹۹۷

Michael Eisenstadt

Monitoring Students from Middle East State Sponsors of Terrorism in the United States:

A Special Report

A significant loophole in U.S. immigration and national security policy allows students from terrorist-sponsoring countries in the Middle East-Iran, Iraq, Libya, Sudan and Syria-to enter the United States to study subjects that can potentially contribute to their countries' chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs. While the majority of foreign students

۱۴ اکتبر ۱۹۹۷

Pagination

Previous page
First page
…
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Current page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
…
Last page
Next page

Supported by the

Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation Program on Great Power Competition and the Middle East

The Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation Program on Great Power Competition and the Middle East focuses on the region as a setting for heightened competition between the United States and other world powers, such as China and Russia.

Sign Up for Email Updates from The Washington Institute

Never miss a breaking event on U.S. policy interests in the Middle East. Customize your subscription to our expert analysis, op-eds, live events, and special reports.

Featured experts

Robert Satloff - source: The Washington Institute

رابرت ستلوف

رابرت ستلوف مدیر اجرایی انستیتو واشنگتن است. ستلوف کارشناس سیاست‌ عربی و اسلامی است و در زمینه روند صلح اعراب و اسرائیل، چالش اسلام سیاسی و ضرورت اصلاح دیپلماسی عمومی ایالات متحده در خاورمیانه مطالب زیادی منتشر کرده است.

Ambassador Dennis Ross

دنیس راس

سفیر دنیس راس، دستیار ویژه پیشین پرزیدنت باراک اوباما، مشاور انستیتو و هموند برجسته ویلیام دیویدسون در انستیتو واشنگتن است.

Michael Singh

مایکل سینگ

مایکل سینگ هموند پژوهشی ارشد لین-سویگ (Lane-Swig) و مدیرعامل انستیتو واشنگتن ‌است

1111 19th Street NW - Suite 500
Washington D.C. 20036
Tel: 202-452-0650
Fax: 202-223-5364

Footer contact links

تماس
اتاق خبر
Subscribe

هدف انستیتو واشنگتن، تعمیق درکی متعادل و واقع‌بینانه از منافع آمریکا در خاورمیانه و نیز پیشبردِ سیاست‌هایی برای حفظ آن منافع است.

انستیتو واشنگتن یک سازمان غیرانتفاعی دارای مجوز 501(c)3 است که تمامی کمک‌های مالی به آن شامل معافیت مالیاتی خواهد شد.

Footer quick links

درباره انستیتو واشنگتن
پشتیبانی از انستیتو
Alumni

Social media

The Washington Institute on Facebook
The Washington Institute on X
The Washington Institute on YouTube
The Washington Institute on LinkedIn

© 2025 کلیه حقوق محفوظ است

Footer

استخدام
حریم خصوصی
حقوق و مجوزها