Skip to main content
TWI logo The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
logo
wordmark
Homepage

Main navigation

  • تحلیل‌ها
  • کارشناسان
  • درباره‌ما
  • پشتیبانی
  • نقشه و چند رسانه‌ای
مباحث روز :
  • نظامی و امنیتی
  • منع اشاعه
  • اسرائیل
  • ایران
  • لبنان
  • سوریه

منطقه‌ها و کشورها

  • اردن
  • اسرائیل
  • ایران
  • ترکیه
  • خاورمیانه
  • سوریه
  • شمال آفریقا
  • عراق
  • فلسطینی‌ها
  • لبنان
  • مصر
  • کشورهای حاشیه‌خلیج فارس

موضوع

  • انرژی و اقتصاد
  • تروریسم
  • خلیج و سیاست حوزه انرژی
  • دمکراسی و اصلاح
  • رقابت قدرت‌های بزرگ
  • روابط عرب و اسرائیل
  • سیاست آمریکا
  • عرب و اسلام سیاسی
  • فرایند صلح
  • منع اشاعه
  • نظامی و امنیتی
TWI English
TWI Arabic: اللغة العربية Fikra Forum

سیاست آمریکا

Policy Analysis on سیاست آمریکا

Filter by:

Brief Analysis
The Democracy Dilemma in the Middle East:
Are Islamists the Answer?
On April 19, 2005, Reuel Marc Gerecht and Robert Satloff held a policy debate at The Washington Institute's Special Policy Forum. Mr. Gerecht is a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and author of The Islamic Paradox: Shiite Clerics, Sunni Fundamentalists, and the Coming of Arab Democracy (2004). Dr
۳ مهٔ ۲۰۰۵
◆
  • Robert Satloff
Brief Analysis
<em>Country Reports on Terrorism 2004:</em>
The State Department Assesses the Broadening Global Jihadist Reach
On April 27, the State Department publicly released its annual report on global terrorism trends, Country Reports on Terrorism 2004 ( read a PDF of the full report). Previously called Patterns of Global Terrorism, the renamed report has generated considerable controversy for the second year in a row, again centered
۲۹ آوریل ۲۰۰۵
◆
  • Michael Jacobson
Brief Analysis
‘Forging a New Relationship’:
The Future Agenda for U.S.-Saudi Relations after the Crawford Summit
On April 25, President George W. Bush and Crown Prince Abdullah, the de facto ruler of Saudi Arabia, held a three-hour meeting in Crawford, Texas, producing a joint statement in which both leaders agreed “to forge a new relationship” between the two countries. Both sides reportedly saw the meeting as
۲۸ آوریل ۲۰۰۵
◆
  • Simon Henderson
Articles & Testimony
The U.S. Can't Afford to Let Negroponte Fail
Later this week, the U.S. Senate is expected to confirm John Negroponte, President George W. Bush’s nominee for the newly created position of director of national intelligence. In this new position, Negroponte will be responsible for managing the 15 agencies comprising the U.S. intelligence community. Despite having served both as
۱۲ آوریل ۲۰۰۵
Brief Analysis
Assessing the Upcoming Bush-Sharon Summit:
Clarifying Ambiguity
One way to judge the success of the upcoming Bush-Sharon summit in Crawford is by examining whether it leads to a meeting of the minds and greater clarity on four pivotal Israeli-Palestinian issues: the terms of the current ceasefire; West Bank settlement activity; the timing of, and eligibility rules for
۸ آوریل ۲۰۰۵
◆
  • David Makovsky
Brief Analysis
France, America, and the Middle East
The fast and steady deterioration of the French-U.S. relationship has recently entered an equally swift upturn. The Bush administration, reelected by a majority vote in 2004, has not changed the substance of its foreign policy. Given a similarly unvarying stance by France, no shift of policy by either nation has
۷ آوریل ۲۰۰۵
◆
  • Jean-David Levitte
Articles & Testimony
Allergic Partners:
Can U.S.-Turkish Relations Be Saved?
When Turkey's Parliament on March 1, 2003 failed to approve the Bush Administration's request for a “northern front” against Iraq, it became clear that the Iraq War would prove a watershed in U.S. - Turkish strategic partnership. Left unanswered at the time were fundamental questions of how relations would develop
۱ آوریل ۲۰۰۵
Articles & Testimony
Memo to: Karen P. Hughes<br>
Re: The Mission of Public Diplomacy
Congratulations on your nomination as undersecretary of state for public diplomacy. Though this is a third-level State Department appointment, with an office about a half-mile away from your former prime spot in the West Wing of the White House, it is actually one of the most important jobs in the
۲۸ مارس ۲۰۰۵
Articles & Testimony
Thinking the Unthinkable
What do Georgia, Ukraine, and Lebanon have in common? Their publics have said no to fear. They would not be silenced or intimidated as they rejected the fraudulent elections and corrupt governments imposed on them. Iraqi Shiites and, to a lesser extent, the Kurds could be added to this list
۲۱ مارس ۲۰۰۵
◆
  • Dennis Ross
Articles & Testimony
U.S. Needs Longer-Term Plan on Terror
We are now 3½ years into the war on terror, with no end in sight. It is time for the U.S. government to acknowledge that fact by thinking longer-term as it combats terrorism. While not necessarily reducing the focus on the day-to-day efforts to prevent a recurrence of 9-11, the
۲۰ مارس ۲۰۰۵
Brief Analysis
Assessing the Bush Administration's Policy of 'Constructive Instability' (Part II):
Regional Dynamics
In Lebanon, the Bush Administration's regional policy of "constructive instability" is approaching a critical juncture, with important decisions looming about how the further implementation of UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1559 relates to other U.S. strategic interests. More generally, the policy is having an effect throughout the region, from the
۱۶ مارس ۲۰۰۵
◆
  • Robert Satloff
Brief Analysis
Assessing the Bush Administration’s Policy of 'Constructive Instability' (Part I):
Lebanon and Syria
The Bush Administration's policy of "constructive instability" in the Middle East is facing a critical juncture in Lebanon. Taking advantage of a rare confluence of events and international interests, President George W. Bush has focused U.S. efforts on one plank of UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1559 -- the withdrawal
۱۵ مارس ۲۰۰۵
◆
  • Robert Satloff
Brief Analysis
After the Hariri Assassination:
Syria, Lebanon, and U.S. Policy
When Bashar al-Asad assumed power in 2001, there was widespread optimism that he would, by virtue of his British education and Western outlook, modernize the Syrian government and expand individual and political rights. Yet, after a short period of preliminary change, dubbed the "Damascus Spring," Asad proved unwilling or unable
۱۰ مارس ۲۰۰۵
Brief Analysis
Changing Turkish Public Attitudes toward the United States:
Premises and Prospects
American and Turkish media have been awash recently with news of increased Turkish resentment toward the United States. Media coverage has focused on negative portrayals of U.S. foreign policy in Turkey, including recent opinion polls such as a January 19 BBC survey, according to which 82 percent of Turks oppose
۷ مارس ۲۰۰۵
◆
  • Soner Cagaptay
Brief Analysis
Bush, Europe, and the Middle East:
Analyzing the Visit
There is a consensus in Europe that President George W. Bush's visit marks a transition after three difficult years of transatlantic relations. Europe cannot ignore this administration for another four years. Rather, it is in Europe's best interests to work with President Bush, because Europeans see the Middle East as
۴ مارس ۲۰۰۵
◆
  • Michael Jacobson
  • Patrick Clawson
Articles & Testimony
An Opening in the Mideast
President Bush declared in Europe that the world cannot rest until there is peace between Israelis and Palestinians. Certainly he knew that Europeans would welcome such words. But I suspect this was less a tactical gesture to the Europeans and more a statement of intent, reflecting his commitment to act
۳ مارس ۲۰۰۵
◆
  • Dennis Ross
Articles & Testimony
Arab-Israeli Futures:
Next Steps for the United States
The attached PDF contains papers on U.S. policy and the Middle East Peace Process, authored by David Makovsky, Robert Malley and Steven Spiegel. They are first contribution to the United States Institute of Peace's (USIP) research project on "Arab-Israeli Futures." These papers offer a range of policy options for the
۲ مارس ۲۰۰۵
◆
  • David Makovsky
Brief Analysis
After Elections:
What Next for Iraq and U.S. Policy?
Freedom As a Strategic Concept Since the September 11 attacks, the Bush administration has radically altered U.S. Middle East policy. Broadly defined, the administration’s view is that democracy and freedom in the region is the central strategic concept offering a serious, long-term alternative to jihadi terrorism. This policy shift marks
۲۳ فوریهٔ ۲۰۰۵
Articles & Testimony
U.S., Europe Facing Similar Problems in War on Terror
President Bush's current trip to Europe is being viewed as a means to ease tensions and promote better relations. The often heated rhetoric over the past few years between the U.S. and Europeans has obscured the fact that they are facing many of the same challenges and have encountered similar
۲۳ فوریهٔ ۲۰۰۵
◆
  • Michael Jacobson
Brief Analysis
Security, Reform, and Peace:
The Three Pillars of U.S. Strategy in the Middle East
The United States is facing an extraordinary moment of challenge in the Middle East, one that demands an integrated U.S. strategy built on a set of three pillars: security, reform, and peace. The security agenda is the most pressing, but it alone is not sufficient. If the United States wants
۲۲ فوریهٔ ۲۰۰۵

Pagination

  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • First page « First
  • …
  • Page 128
  • Page 129
  • Page 130
  • Page 131
  • Current page 132
  • Page 133
  • Page 134
  • Page 135
  • Page 136
  • …
  • Last page Last »
  • Next page Next ›
Supported by the

Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation Program on Great Power Competition and the Middle East

The Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation Program on Great Power Competition and the Middle East focuses on the region as a setting for heightened competition between the United States and other world powers, such as China and Russia.

Sign Up for Email Updates from The Washington Institute

Never miss a breaking event on U.S. policy interests in the Middle East. Customize your subscription to our expert analysis, op-eds, live events, and special reports.

Sign up

Featured experts

Robert Satloff - source: The Washington Institute
رابرت ستلوف
رابرت ستلوف مدیر اجرایی انستیتو واشنگتن است. ستلوف کارشناس سیاست‌ عربی و اسلامی است و در زمینه روند صلح اعراب و اسرائیل، چالش اسلام سیاسی و ضرورت اصلاح دیپلماسی عمومی ایالات متحده در خاورمیانه مطالب زیادی منتشر کرده است.
Ambassador Dennis Ross
دنیس راس
سفیر دنیس راس، دستیار ویژه پیشین پرزیدنت باراک اوباما، مشاور انستیتو و هموند برجسته ویلیام دیویدسون در انستیتو واشنگتن است.
Michael Singh
مایکل سینگ
مایکل سینگ هموند پژوهشی ارشد لین-سویگ (Lane-Swig) و مدیرعامل انستیتو واشنگتن ‌است
Background image with TWI branding
logo
wordmark
Homepage

1111 19th Street NW - Suite 500
Washington D.C. 20036
Tel: 202-452-0650
Fax: 202-223-5364

Footer contact links

  • تماس
  • اتاق خبر
  • Subscribe

هدف انستیتو واشنگتن، تعمیق درکی متعادل و واقع‌بینانه از منافع آمریکا در خاورمیانه و نیز پیشبردِ سیاست‌هایی برای حفظ آن منافع است.

انستیتو واشنگتن یک سازمان غیرانتفاعی دارای مجوز 501(c)3 است که تمامی کمک‌های مالی به آن شامل معافیت مالیاتی خواهد شد.

Footer quick links

  • درباره انستیتو واشنگتن
  • پشتیبانی از انستیتو
  • Alumni

Social media

  • The Washington Institute on Facebook facebook
  • The Washington Institute on X x
  • The Washington Institute on YouTube youtube
  • The Washington Institute on LinkedIn linkedin

© 2025 کلیه حقوق محفوظ است

Footer

  • استخدام
  • حریم خصوصی
  • حقوق و مجوزها