Skip to main content
TWI logo The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
logo
wordmark
Homepage

Main navigation

  • تحلیل‌ها
  • کارشناسان
  • درباره‌ما
  • پشتیبانی
  • نقشه و چند رسانه‌ای
مباحث روز :
  • دمکراسی و اصلاح
  • تروریسم
/
  • لبنان
  • ایران
  • اسرائیل
  • سوریه

منطقه‌ها و کشورها

  • اردن
  • اسرائیل
  • ایران
  • ترکیه
  • خاورمیانه
  • سوریه
  • شمال آفریقا
  • عراق
  • فلسطینی‌ها
  • لبنان
  • مصر
  • کشورهای حاشیه‌خلیج فارس

موضوع

  • انرژی و اقتصاد
  • تروریسم
  • خلیج و سیاست حوزه انرژی
  • دمکراسی و اصلاح
  • رقابت قدرت‌های بزرگ
  • روابط عرب و اسرائیل
  • سیاست آمریکا
  • عرب و اسلام سیاسی
  • فرایند صلح
  • منع اشاعه
  • نظامی و امنیتی
TWI English
TWI Arabic: اللغة العربية Fikra Forum

عراق

Policy Analysis on عراق

Filter by:

Articles & Testimony
Full Democracy May Not Be an Answer for Mideast
A false debate has broken out between those who say a key goal of any attack against Iraq would be the creation of an Iraqi democracy and those who believe the world is ultimately more secure if reliable authoritarians can be found in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East
۲۴ نوامبر ۲۰۰۲
◆
  • David Makovsky
Brief Analysis
Toward Renewed Weapons Inspections in Iraq?
UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1441, adopted after weeks of diplomatic aerobics, authorized renewed weapons inspections in Iraq and outlined a timetable for the inspections process, with mandatory deadlines for Iraqi compliance. UNSCR 1441's popularity is remarkable: the United States, Russia, France, and Syria all like it, and even Iraq
۲۰ نوامبر ۲۰۰۲
Articles & Testimony
Deadline for Hussein
The U.N. Security Council has spoken, and Secretary of State Colin Powell is receiving well-deserved praise for producing a unanimous vote for a tough resolution. But President Bush had it right: The hard part begins now. As the president has said, there have been 16 Security Council resolutions against Iraq
۱۲ نوامبر ۲۰۰۲
◆
  • Dennis Ross
Articles & Testimony
Follow WWII's Torch into Iraq
As the chance of war with Iraq grows, we should pause today to recall the 60th anniversary of Operation Torch, the American-British invasion of North Africa during World War II. Thanks to Torch, the momentum began to swing against Nazi Germany, an evil regime that used what we now call
۸ نوامبر ۲۰۰۲
◆
  • Robert Satloff
Articles & Testimony
U.S. Must Address Turkey's War Fears
Turkey, though partners with the United States in the war on terror, is worried about the negative impact that unseating Saddam Hussein could have in the volatile Kurdish areas of northern Iraq. Washington must give a high priority to addressing this concern to ensure full Turkish participation in a coming
۳ نوامبر ۲۰۰۲
◆
  • Soner Cagaptay
Iraqi Kurds and Their Neighbors
To download an audio file of Victor Morales's interview with Soner Cagaptay, visit www.voanews.com/mediastore/nn_1023_Focus.ram
۲۳ اکتبر ۲۰۰۲
◆
  • Soner Cagaptay
Brief Analysis
U.S.-Israeli Consultation on Iraq Likely to Be Key in Bush-Sharon Meeting
Tomorrow, October 16, President George W. Bush hosts Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon. Although the two have met frequently in the year and a half since they assumed office, this session is likely to be different from previous encounters. Undoubtedly, they will discuss the situation with the Palestinians; this will
۱۵ اکتبر ۲۰۰۲
◆
  • David Makovsky
Brief Analysis
The Future of Iraq Policy
On October 5, 2002, Zalmay Khalilzad, special assistant to the president for Near East, Southwest Asian, and North African affairs, addressed The Washington Institute's 2002 Weinberg Founders Conference. The following are excerpts from his remarks, edited for readability. Read an edited transcript of his full remarks, including the question-and-answer session
۸ اکتبر ۲۰۰۲
In-Depth Reports
The Future of Iraq:
U.S. Policy (full transcript)
Note: Mr. Khalilzad's remarks represent his own views and not necessarily those of the U.S. government. Bob Goldman: My name is Bob Goldman. I'm a member of the Executive Committee of the Institute. One year ago when we met here the focus of our conference was the aftermath of September
۵ اکتبر ۲۰۰۲
In-Depth Reports
What Next after Saddam?
Patrick Clawson, The Washington Institute: I want to say a few words about the standards of success by which we should judge progress in Iraq after Saddam Husayn's regime is deposed. Two issues are of particular importance: weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and democracy. Because any war against Iraq will
۴ اکتبر ۲۰۰۲
In-Depth Reports
The War on Terror, Next Phases:
The Middle East Dimension
*Mr. Pillar's remarks represent his own views and not necessarily those of the U.S. government. [Due to an unfortunate technical problem, the panelists' opening presentations were not recorded. An edited transcription of the panel's question-and-answer session follows.] Matthew Levitt, The Washington Institute: One of the more important elements driving the
۴ اکتبر ۲۰۰۲
In-Depth Reports
Iraq, Palestine, Then What?
Can America Promote a Liberal, Democratic Middle East?
*Mr. Khoury's remarks represent his own views and not those of the U.S. government. Robert Satloff, The Washington Institute: The basic premise of this panel is that the United States is currently promoting coercive democratization in Iraq and in the West Bank and Gaza. U.S. policy is coercive in the
۴ اکتبر ۲۰۰۲
In-Depth Reports
The Regional Implications of Pursuing 'Regime Change' in Iraq (Part IV)
Unfortunately, there is no Iraqi on this panel. I wish there were. But because Kuwait is closest, in many ways, to Iraq, we Kuwaitis probably share some of the Iraqi vision of the future of Iraq. The atmosphere in Kuwait is one of anxiety and nervousness, with a strong sense
۴ اکتبر ۲۰۰۲
In-Depth Reports
The Regional Implications of Pursuing 'Regime Change' in Iraq (Part III)
I would like to preface my remarks with some thoughts about the fine speech that Zalmay Khalilzad made earlier in these proceedings. As good a speech as it was, it made our job on this panel more difficult. I am more confused now about what kind of Iraq the United
۴ اکتبر ۲۰۰۲
In-Depth Reports
The Regional Implications of Pursuing 'Regime Change' in Iraq (Part II)
In order to have my remarks put in the right context, I would rephrase the title of this session as "The Regional Implications of Regime Change in Iraq as a Result of External Military Action." Were change to come as a result of other actions -- by the Iraqi people
۴ اکتبر ۲۰۰۲
In-Depth Reports
The Regional Implications of Pursuing 'Regime Change' in Iraq (Part I)
Those expressing concern about the prospect of regime change in Iraq fall into two groups: those who are afraid that the intended change will fail and those who are afraid that it will succeed, with the latter group being the more vociferous. As others have said repeatedly, the long-term objective
۴ اکتبر ۲۰۰۲
In-Depth Reports
The Future of Iraq:
U.S. Policy
Note: Mr. Khalilzad's remarks represent his own views and not necessarily those of the U.S. government. I want to give you the Bush administration's perspective on where we are and what our vision is for Iraq. We believe that Saddam Husayn's regime is determined to retain, expand, and once again
۴ اکتبر ۲۰۰۲
In-Depth Reports
Confrontation with Saddam's Iraq:
A Military Assessment
A little more than a year ago, the most vile terror attack in the history of mankind took place in the United States, devastating the principal symbols of American military and economic power, indeed the very symbols of freedom and capitalism in the eyes of the world. September 11 --
۴ اکتبر ۲۰۰۲
Brief Analysis
Enhancing the Turkish-American Alliance:
The Campaign for Iraq and Other Possibilities
Assistant Secretary of State Elizabeth Jones was in Ankara Monday to discuss foreign policy issues including Iraq with her Turkish counterparts. Interestingly, Iraq's vice premier Tariq Aziz visited Ankara yesterday for the same purpose. These trips come at a crucial time as Washington prepares for a confrontation with Saddam Husayn
۲ اکتبر ۲۰۰۲
◆
  • Soner Cagaptay
Brief Analysis
Shaping a New UN Draft Resolution on Iraq
The United States and Britain are consulting with the other three permanent members of the UN Security Council (Russia, France, and China) before introducing a new draft resolution on Iraq. Much attention has been given to whether the resolution will explicitly authorize the use of force. At least as important
۲۷ سپتامبر ۲۰۰۲
◆
  • Patrick Clawson

Pagination

  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • First page « First
  • …
  • Page 69
  • Page 70
  • Page 71
  • Page 72
  • Current page 73
  • Page 74
  • Page 75
  • Page 76
  • Page 77
  • …
  • Last page Last »
  • Next page Next ›

Sign Up for Email Updates from The Washington Institute

Never miss a breaking event on U.S. policy interests in the Middle East. Customize your subscription to our expert analysis, op-eds, live events, and special reports.

Sign up

Background image with TWI branding
logo
wordmark
Homepage

1111 19th Street NW - Suite 500
Washington D.C. 20036
Tel: 202-452-0650
Fax: 202-223-5364

Footer contact links

  • تماس
  • اتاق خبر
  • Subscribe

هدف انستیتو واشنگتن، تعمیق درکی متعادل و واقع‌بینانه از منافع آمریکا در خاورمیانه و نیز پیشبردِ سیاست‌هایی برای حفظ آن منافع است.

انستیتو واشنگتن یک سازمان غیرانتفاعی دارای مجوز 501(c)3 است که تمامی کمک‌های مالی به آن شامل معافیت مالیاتی خواهد شد.

Footer quick links

  • درباره انستیتو واشنگتن
  • پشتیبانی از انستیتو
  • Alumni

Social media

  • The Washington Institute on Facebook facebook
  • The Washington Institute on X x
  • The Washington Institute on YouTube youtube
  • The Washington Institute on LinkedIn linkedin

© 2025 کلیه حقوق محفوظ است

Footer

  • استخدام
  • حریم خصوصی
  • حقوق و مجوزها