Skip to main content
The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Menu
Toggle Main Menu
Homepage
Main navigation
تحلیلها
کارشناسان
دربارهما
پشتیبانی
نقشه و چند رسانهای
مباحث روز :
نظامی و امنیتی
منع اشاعه
اسرائیل
ایران
لبنان
سوریه
Toggle List of
منطقهها
منطقهها و کشورها
اردن
اسرائیل
ایران
ترکیه
خاورمیانه
سوریه
شمال آفریقا
عراق
فلسطینیها
لبنان
مصر
کشورهای حاشیهخلیج فارس
موضوع
انرژی و اقتصاد
تروریسم
خلیج و سیاست حوزه انرژی
دمکراسی و اصلاح
رقابت قدرتهای بزرگ
روابط عرب و اسرائیل
سیاست آمریکا
عرب و اسلام سیاسی
فرایند صلح
منع اشاعه
نظامی و امنیتی
Close List of All Regions and Issues
Close
Search Policy Analysis
TWI English
TWI Arabic:
اللغة العربية
Fikra Forum
Close Menu
Close
Search Policy Analysis
جستجو
All Policy Analysis by مایکل آیزنستات
Filter by:
Keyword
Region
- Any -
مصر
کشورهای حاشیهخلیج فارس
ایران
عراق
اسرائیل
اردن
لبنان
خاورمیانه
شمال آفریقا
فلسطینیها
سوریه
ترکیه
Issue
- Any -
عرب و اسلام سیاسی
روابط عرب و اسرائیل
دمکراسی و اصلاح
انرژی و اقتصاد
رقابت قدرتهای بزرگ
خلیج و سیاست حوزه انرژی
نظامی و امنیتی
فرایند صلح
منع اشاعه
تروریسم
سیاست آمریکا
تاریخ انتشار
- Any -
Past 7 Days
Past 30 Days
Past Year
Custom range...
Start date
End date
Type
- Any -
مقالهها و دیدگاهها
تحلیل کوتاه
گزارشهای تفصیلی
Sort by
Oldest first
Newest first
Found
354
results
Articles & Testimony
Missiles and Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) in Iraq and Iran:
Current Developments and Potential for Future Surprises
The following analysis was prepared for the Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States (The Rumsfeld Commission), March 23, 1998. This paper will attempt to answer the following questions: 1) What are the current missile capabilities of Iraq and Iran? 2) What kind of WMD payloads
۲۸ مارس ۱۹۹۸
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Iran and Weapons of Mass Destruction
Despite the recent focus on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (WMD), Iran poses a greater long-term threat to U.S. interests in the Persian Gulf. Iran possesses a large chemical weapons (CW) arsenal consisting primarily of first generation (World War I era) agents, and it is believed to have a nerve
۴ مارس ۱۹۹۸
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD):
Unresolved Issues
The agreement hammered out by UN Secretary General Kofi Annan and Iraqi President Saddam Hussein resolving (at least temporarily) the most recent crisis over access to suspected WMD-related sites in Iraq fails to address the fundamental problem the international community faces in Iraq: Baghdad's continued refusal to comply with UN
۲۷ فوریهٔ ۱۹۹۸
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Assessing the UN-Iraq Accord:
Impact on Iraq, UNSCOM, and U.S. Policy
The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed by United Nations (UN) Secretary General Kofi Annan and Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz marks a turning point in the approach of the international community toward the regime of Saddam Hussein, and the activities of the UN Special Commission (UNSCOM) and International Atomic
۲۴ فوریهٔ ۱۹۹۸
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
The Crisis with Iraq:
Reviving the Military Option
Saddam Husayn's speech last Saturday marking the anniversary of Operation Desert Storm confirmed that the current impasse is no ordinary Iraq crisis. Saddam gave the Security Council until May 20 to lift sanctions on Iraq or he would cease cooperation with the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM). Saddam's speech also
۲۲ ژانویهٔ ۱۹۹۸
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Kenneth Pollack
In-Depth Reports
'Knives, Tanks, and Missiles':
Israel's Security Revolution
Born a small, beleaguered state, outnumbered and surrounded by enemies committed to its destruction, Israel early in its history formulated a distinctive set of principles for its basic defense policy. To outside observers, Israel's approach became emblematic of, indeed, in some respects indistinguishable from its national character. Throughout the quarter-century
۱ ژانویهٔ ۱۹۹۸
◆
Eliot Cohen
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Military Action against Iraq:
Critical Considerations
As Secretary of State Madeleine Albright prepares to meet with the foreign ministers of Britain, France, and Russia tonight in Geneva to discuss a possible diplomatic solution to the standoff between Iraq and the UN, Washington continues preparations for a military option: the U.S.S. George Washington carrier battle group is
۱۹ نوامبر ۱۹۹۷
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
The Crisis with Iraq:
Options for U.S. Policy
Saddam Husayn probably had several motives in seeking to disrupt UN weapons inspections. First, he sought to undermine the effectiveness of the UN weapons inspectors, if not expel them altogether, because they are the main obstacle to his efforts to transform Iraq into a regional power. Second, Saddam currently has
۱۸ نوامبر ۱۹۹۷
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Kenneth Pollack
Brief Analysis
U.S. Policy and Chinese Proliferation to Iran:
A Small Leap Forward?
Iran has been a key issue in this week's U.S.-China summit. Two weeks ago, Beijing promised to halt the transfer of antiship missiles to Iran and, in the run-up to the summit, the Chinese provided written assurances to Washington that it will not initiate any new nuclear cooperation with Iran
۳۱ اکتبر ۱۹۹۷
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Halting Russian Aid to Iran's Nuclear and Ballistic Missile Programs
This past weekend, Vice President Gore and the President's special envoy on Russian-Iranian proliferation issues, Ambassador Frank Wisner, arrived in Moscow to meet with Russian Premier Viktor Chernomyrdin and other senior officials. Topping the agenda was a subject of growing concern for U.S. policymakers: Russia's deepening involvement in the proliferation
۲۵ سپتامبر ۱۹۹۷
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Israel and the Palestinian Authority:
Edging toward the Abyss?
Secretary of State Madeleine Albright's visit this week to the Middle East may be the last chance for the United States to avert a potential drift toward armed confrontation between Israel and the Palestinian Authority (PA), due to the latter's failure to mount a sustained effort to halt terrorism by
۱۱ سپتامبر ۱۹۹۷
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Turkish-Israeli Military Cooperation:
An Assessment
The deepening military relationship between Israel and Turkey has heightened Arab and Iranian concerns about the potential implications of this new axis between the two most powerful states in the region. Though these anxieties seem exaggerated, it is animated by a fear that this thus far limited relationship could eventually
۲۴ ژوئیهٔ ۱۹۹۷
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Israel and the Palestinian Authority:
The Security Agenda
As the stand-off over Har Homa continues, Israeli leaders and commentators are increasingly calling for a shake-up of the incremental Oslo process and an immediate move to substantive "final status" talks. According to this argument, leapfrogging over the rest of the "interim phase" has the benefit of avoiding a series
۲۰ مارس ۱۹۹۷
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Iraq and UNSCOM:
A Crucial Test for U.S. Policy
Four years ago this month, Iraqi President Saddam Husayn tried to strengthen his hand against President-elect Clinton by rebuffing UN weapons inspectors, spiriting anti-ship missiles out of a former Iraqi naval base in Kuwait, and challenging no-fly zones in northern and southern Iraq. As he begins his second term, President
۲۱ ژانویهٔ ۱۹۹۷
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Crisis in Iraq:
Saddam Hussein, the Kurds, and U.S. Policy
Although the Clinton Administration's response to Saddam Hussein's attack on Erbil is based on a moral commitment to protect the Kurds of northern Iraq, Washington has focused its response on southern Iraq. U.S. strikes have hit targets in southern Iraq, rather than in the north; President Clinton has not demanded
۶ سپتامبر ۱۹۹۶
◆
Alan Makovsky
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
The U.S. Strikes on Iraq:
What Was Accomplished? What Next?
The U.S. cruise missile strikes on Iraqi air defense forces yesterday and today were intended to have three main consequences: 1) to exact a price for the Iraqi army's actions in Irbil and thereby restore credibility to U.S. deterrence; 2) to degrade Iraqi air defenses in the newly extended no-fly
۴ سپتامبر ۱۹۹۶
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Iranian Terror against Americans?
Possible U.S. Responses
The past week has seen speculation by Defense Secretary William Perry tying Iran to the recent bombing of U.S. military personnel in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia and a report in Time linking Iran to the downing of TWA 800. How might the U.S. respond if these reports are true? A New
۷ اوت ۱۹۹۶
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Patrick Clawson
In-Depth Reports
Iranian Military Power:
Capabilities and Intentions
In 1989, following a costly eight-year war with Iraq, Iran initiated a major military build-up intended to rebuild, expand, and modernize its ravaged armed forces and thereby transform itself into a regional military power. Iran's quest for nuclear weapons, its naval build-up in the Persian Gulf, its efforts to undermine
۱ اوت ۱۹۹۶
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Hizballah Operations:
Past Patterns, Future Prospects
An attack by Hizballah on an outpost of the South Lebanon Army last week underscores both the positive and negative outcomes of the written "understanding" negotiated by Secretary of State Warren Christopher -- namely, while northern Israel and Lebanese civilian targets should be spared further attacks, armed conflict between Israel
۷ مهٔ ۱۹۹۶
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Brief Analysis
Iran's Military Power:
Capabilities and Intentions
On March 13, 1996, Michael Eisenstadt, Senior Fellow at The Washington Institute, and Dr. Geoffrey Kemp, Director of Regional Strategic Programs at the Nixon Center for Peace and Freedom, addressed The Washington Institute's Policy Forum. Mr. Eisenstadt presented the findings of his forthcoming Policy Paper, Iran's Military Power: Capabilities and
۱۳ مارس ۱۹۹۶
◆
Michael Eisenstadt
Pagination
Previous page
‹‹
First page
« First
…
Page
10
Page
11
Page
12
Page
13
Page
14
Page
15
Page
16
Current page
17
Page
18
Last page
Last »
Next page
››