AS WAR-CRIES go, “There are no good options” leaves something to be desired. But punishing the Syrian regime for the chemical attack on August 21st is not easy to get right. The response must be big enough to be taken seriously, in Syria and elsewhere—no one wants a repeat of the desultory and misguided attack on a Sudanese drug factory in 1998—if it is to have the desired effect. At the same time it must not be seen as making the attackers party to the war the regime is fighting, or escalating the conflict across the region. Such calibration may be too fine a task to achieve with the blunt instruments of war.
Briefing | The military options
The Tomahawks fly
A Western attack will not want for firepower or targets—but it will need to be finely judged if it is to work
This article appeared in the Briefing section of the print edition under the headline "The Tomahawks fly"
Briefing August 31st 2013
More from Briefing
America’s $61bn aid package buys Ukraine time
It must use it wisely
America is uniquely ill-suited to handle a falling population
Which is a worry, because much of it is already shrinking
Homeowners face a $25trn bill from climate change
Property, the world’s biggest asset class, is also its most vulnerable