Briefing | The military options

The Tomahawks fly

A Western attack will not want for firepower or targets—but it will need to be finely judged if it is to work

AS WAR-CRIES go, “There are no good options” leaves something to be desired. But punishing the Syrian regime for the chemical attack on August 21st is not easy to get right. The response must be big enough to be taken seriously, in Syria and elsewhere—no one wants a repeat of the desultory and misguided attack on a Sudanese drug factory in 1998—if it is to have the desired effect. At the same time it must not be seen as making the attackers party to the war the regime is fighting, or escalating the conflict across the region. Such calibration may be too fine a task to achieve with the blunt instruments of war.

This article appeared in the Briefing section of the print edition under the headline "The Tomahawks fly"

Hit him hard

From the August 31st 2013 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Briefing

America’s $61bn aid package buys Ukraine time

It must use it wisely

America is uniquely ill-suited to handle a falling population

Which is a worry, because much of it is already shrinking


Homeowners face a $25trn bill from climate change

Property, the world’s biggest asset class, is also its most vulnerable