Middle East & Africa | Nuclear diplomacy and Iran

Where’s the deal?

Even if direct negotiations between the United States and Iran ensue, few predict a happy outcome

|WASHINGTON, DC

ON THE face of it, all that is needed at this stage of Iran’s nuclear diplomacy with the United States and other world powers is for the Iranians and the so-called P5+1 (the UN Security Council’s permanent members plus Germany) to agree on a time and a place for their next meeting. Instead, each side has been blaming the other for refusing to make any commitment. A European official has spoken of Iranian “delaying tactics”, while the press in Tehran denounces the “unpreparedness” of Iran’s Western interlocutors.

“If the two sides can’t agree on details of this kind,” rues a seasoned Iran-watcher in Washington, “it doesn’t bode well for the negotiations themselves.” Indeed, for all the conciliatory instincts of America’s re-elected president and his nomination of relative doves to run important parts of foreign policy, even advocates of detente are sceptical about the prospect of improved relations in Barack Obama’s second term.

This article appeared in the Middle East & Africa section of the print edition under the headline "Where’s the deal?"

The next supermodel

From the February 2nd 2013 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Middle East & Africa

The Middle East has a militia problem

More than a quarter of the region’s 400m people live in states dominated by armed groups

How much do Palestinians pay to get out of Gaza?

Middlemen are profiting from Gazans’ desperation


Why Iranian dissidents love Cyrus, an ancient Persian king

The British Museum is sending one of Iran’s adored antiquities to Israel