Russia’s Action Means the U.S. Can No Longer Back Down

James Franklin Jeffrey

James Franklin Jeffrey is the Philip Solondz distinguished visiting fellow at The Washington Institute for Near Eastern Policy. He has served as U.S. ambassador to Turkey (2008-2010) and Iraq (2010-2012) and was an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser in the George W. Bush administration.

Updated August 13, 2014, 3:28 PM

The crisis in Ukraine does not threaten U.S. “cooperation” with Russia on Syria. Why? Because there was no true cooperation in the first place, beyond the limited exception of the chemical weapons agreement, itself of little import in the larger struggle.

The crisis in Ukraine and the unveiling of the "real" Putin have made impossible any new U.S. reluctance to act in Syria, were chemical weapons used anew.

President Putin’s actions, language and outrageous dissembling on Ukraine, supposedly in favor of self-determination at the expense of sovereignty, put to the lie his justification of the Assad regime on the basis of sovereignty at the expense of self-determination. This hypocrisy should not surprise anyone. Putin is in the Syria game not to cooperate with the United States, but to defend an ally who provides bases and purchases weapons, and to block effective U.S. action along the lines of Kosovo or Libya, which he sees as illegal. The new U.S. and E.U. sanctions will make Putin even more determined to support Assad.

As for the chemical weapons agreement, it came about only because Russia believed the U.S. would otherwise strike. If the Russians stop encouraging Assad to adhere to what is now a United Nations Security Council resolution on chemical weapons, they undercut their own great power status flowing from permanent five membership on the council. But even if they did stop, the U.S. threat to use force if chemical weapons are employed again is still out there.

Ironically, the crisis in Ukraine and the unveiling of the "real" Putin have made impossible any new American reluctance to act, were chemical weapons used anew. The Obama administration simply could not be seen as backing down again, this time in a region, unlike Crimea, where the correlation of forces favors America.


Join Opinion on Facebook and follow updates on twitter.com/roomfordebate.

Topics: Iran, Russia, Syria, Ukraine, foreign affairs, middle east

Ukraine’s Effect on a Deal for Syria

How will deteriorating relations between the West and Russia affect Syria? Read More »

Debaters